The appellant father appealed a trial judgment awarding increased child support for his two daughters, arguing procedural unfairness and errors in quantum.
He contended that the trial judge should not have awarded Guidelines support without a formal application and that the children should support their own university education through employment and loans.
The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal, finding no procedural prejudice as the appellant was aware of the issues and had examined the children at trial.
The Court also upheld the quantum of support, noting the trial judge properly accounted for the children's earnings and the terms of the parties' separation agreement.
