The plaintiffs and defendants brought cross-motions for undertakings and refusals arising from examinations for discovery in an action for breach of a rental income guarantee program.
The court ordered the individual defendants to serve further and better affidavits of documents, including searches of relevant email addresses and phone numbers.
The court also ruled on numerous specific refusals from the examinations of several witnesses, applying principles of relevance and proportionality, and upholding claims of solicitor-client and litigation privilege where appropriate.
