The plaintiff brought motions to amend the statement of claim to add her minor children as anonymous plaintiffs with herself as litigation guardian, and to strike portions of the defendants' statement of defence.
The defendants opposed her appointment as litigation guardian, alleging a potential conflict of interest, and opposed striking the pleadings.
The court appointed the plaintiff as litigation guardian, finding no evidence of a conflict.
The court also struck several paragraphs of the statement of defence that pleaded evidence or irrelevant post-incident facts, while allowing paragraphs relevant to the police investigation to remain.