The appellants appealed a director's decision under the Technical Standards and Safety Act, 2000, which partially affirmed inspector's orders following a carbon monoxide poisoning incident.
The appellants argued the director erred by relying on insufficient evidence from an inadequate investigation and breached procedural fairness by holding a written hearing and failing to order document production.
The Divisional Court dismissed the appeal, finding the director properly weighed the evidence in an administrative context and that the written hearing met the requisite duty of fairness.
