The applicant sought judicial review of a Refugee Appeal Division (RAD) decision dismissing his appeal.
He claimed a risk of persecution in India due to his interfaith marriage to a Muslim woman.
The RAD found he had viable internal flight alternatives in Delhi and Mumbai.
The applicant argued the RAD failed to consider the general risk to Muslims in India.
The Court found the RAD reasonably considered the documentary evidence and concluded association with Muslims did not create a risk of persecution by state or non-state actors.
The application was dismissed.
