The respondent brought a motion seeking to enforce a property sale agreement, obtain summary judgment for child support (section 7 expenses), and strike the applicant's pleadings due to non-compliance and unreasonable behaviour.
The court found that a binding agreement for the sale of jointly owned properties existed and incorporated it into an order, granting the respondent sole carriage over the sale.
Summary judgment for the property sale was also granted in the alternative.
However, the court declined to make the temporary order for 100% section 7 expenses against the applicant final, finding a genuine issue for trial regarding the respondent's self-sufficiency.
The applicant's pleadings were struck regarding property and financial issues, and she was precluded from seeking further relief on these matters or bringing motions while in breach of disclosure orders.
The respondent's request for an uncontested trial was dismissed.
Costs were awarded to the respondent due to the applicant's unreasonable conduct.
