The appellant appealed a decision ordering her to pay the respondent physiotherapy clinic for unpaid treatment accounts out of her motor vehicle accident settlement.
The appellant argued the matter should have proceeded as an action rather than an application, challenged the factual findings, and argued the interest rate violated the Interest Act.
The Divisional Court dismissed the appeal, finding that the procedural and interest arguments were improperly raised for the first time on appeal.
Furthermore, the court found no material facts in dispute and held that the Interest Act did not apply because the interest rate was governed by the Statutory Accident Benefits Schedule.