The applicant sought custody of her daughter, child support, spousal support, health insurance coverage, and costs against the respondent.
The applicant alleged a continuous common law relationship from November 2004 to March 2009 during which the respondent accepted parental responsibilities for her child.
The respondent denied continuous cohabitation, claiming he maintained his primary residence in London with his own children and only visited the applicant periodically.
The court found the applicant's evidence insufficient to establish continuous cohabitation for three years or that the respondent accepted parental responsibilities.
The claims for spousal support and child support were dismissed.
The applicant retained her existing custody order.
