The responding party brought a motion for temporary relief pending trial in a family law dispute concerning child support and extraordinary expenses.
The court continued a prior order preventing enforcement of extraordinary expenses through the Family Responsibility Office, finding that the conflicting affidavit evidence regarding the amount and apportionment of those expenses created issues requiring trial.
The court also adjusted the payor’s guideline child support based on confirmed income figures, ordering retroactive support based on a 2011–2012 income of $44,850 and prospective support based on a 2013 income of $48,464.
The court further authorized questioning sessions in light of the triable issues and declined to make a costs order given the divided success on the motion.
