The accused was charged with two counts of sexual assault against a cleaner working in a downtown concourse.
The accused admitted to committing two common assaults but denied they were sexual in nature.
The court rejected the accused's evidence as not credible and found the complainant's evidence reliable.
Applying cross-count similar fact reasoning, the court found that the first assault was intentionally sexual and that the second assault, occurring moments later, was also objectively sexual in nature.
The accused was found guilty on both counts.
