The appellants moved for an extension of time to file a notice of appeal, while the respondents sought security for costs against one corporate appellant.
The court held the delay was brief, the intention to appeal had always existed, no prejudice arose, and the proposed appeal raised arguable issues of law.
The extension of time was granted.
The security for costs motion was denied without prejudice because the evidence regarding inability to pay was unclear and the related appellant was said to be able to satisfy costs.
