2 total
Court fixes motion costs under Rule 57.03 after dismissal of injunction motion.
Following dismissal of a motion for interim injunctive relief, the court addressed costs.
The respondents sought partial indemnity costs and the applicant did not challenge the amounts claimed or the reasonableness of the time spent and hourly rates.
The applicant argued that costs should be in the cause, determined by the judge hearing the ultimate application, or that no costs should be ordered.
Applying Rule 57.03 of the Rules of Civil Procedure, the court held that costs of the motion should be fixed absent a more just order and found no basis to defer or decline a costs award.
Partial indemnity costs were awarded to each respondent.
Interim injunction refused where alleged losses from licence termination were compensable in damages.
The applicant sought an interim injunction and relief from forfeiture arising from the cancellation of billboard licence agreements on railway lands.
The respondents terminated the licences and demanded removal of approximately 240 billboard structures and payment of alleged rental arrears.
The court applied the three‑part test for interlocutory injunctions and found that although a serious issue existed regarding the parties’ conduct and contractual interpretation, the applicant failed to establish irreparable harm because any loss could be compensated by damages.
The balance of convenience did not favour either party.
Interim equitable relief was therefore inappropriate in what was fundamentally a monetary dispute.
