Following a substantive decision under the Substitute Decisions Act, 1992 appointing family members as guardians of an incapable adult, the court determined costs arising from competing guardianship applications.
The successful parties sought elevated costs due to the applicant’s conduct in initiating and pursuing the litigation.
The court held that costs in SDA proceedings follow the general civil litigation principles under s.131 of the Courts of Justice Act and Rule 57 of the Rules of Civil Procedure.
Finding the applicant’s conduct precipitous, belligerent, and motivated by collateral dissatisfaction with estate arrangements rather than concern for the incapable person’s welfare, the court ordered costs on a substantial indemnity basis.
Fixed costs were awarded to the successful parties, payable by the unsuccessful applicant.