P. Ezzatian is an Ontario lawyer with 4 court cases on record from 2020 to 2023.

What courts has P. Ezzatian appeared in?

P. Ezzatian has appeared in Superior Court of Justice.

How many cases has P. Ezzatian handled?

P. Ezzatian has 4 cases on record from 2020 to 2023.

What judges has P. Ezzatian appeared before?

P. Ezzatian has most frequently appeared before Justice Chalmers, Justice MacNeil, Justice P. Tamara Sugunasiri.

P. Ezzatian | Lawyer

4 total

NO.: Nelco Mechanical Limited v. 2335213 Ontario Inc et al., 2023 ONSC 1521

The plaintiff brought a motion for an order to impose a discovery plan and require the defendants to produce certain corporate and financial documents in a construction dispute involving allegations of breach of trust.

The court reviewed the disputed documents and ordered production of certificates of payment, mortgage documents, and relevant bank statements, while limiting the request for the complete corporate minute book.

The court also ordered the plaintiff to produce evidence of delivery of the outstanding invoices.

A discovery plan reflecting these rulings was imposed.

SCJMar 6, 2023

Respondent Counsel

Stopfalls Canada v. V.T. P. Lee Medicine Professional Corp.; Dargahi v. V.T.P. Lee Medicine Professional Corporation; Dr. Shervin Abbaszadeh Dentistry Professional Corp. v. V.T.P. Lee Medicine Professional Corp., 2021 ONSC 3493

A case conference was held to establish a timetable for three actions arising from a water loss incident.

The moving party confirmed it owned the water heater and did not retain maintenance services, leading the responding parties to seek instructions to dismiss the action against the rental and maintenance companies.

The parties agreed to a schedule for discoveries and to an order that the three actions be tried together.

SCJMay 7, 2021

Respondent Counsel

Stopfalls Canada v. V.T. P. Lee Medicine Professional Corp.; Dargahi v. V.T.P. Lee Medicine Professional Corporation; Dr. Shervin Abbaszadeh Dentistry Professional Corp. v. V.T.P. Lee Medicine Professional Corp., 2021 ONSC 2708

Three actions were brought arising out of a water loss incident.

The defendant sought a timetable for the conduct of the actions due to the complexity of scheduling examinations for discovery with multiple parties.

The court directed the defendant to provide information regarding the ownership and maintenance of the water heater to determine if Enercare or Reliance Home Comfort are proper parties.

The case conference was adjourned to establish the timetable and determine the status of the actions against the water heater companies.

The court also indicated a willingness to order the three actions to be tried together upon consent of the parties.

SCJApr 9, 2021

Respondent Counsel

Scace v. Withers et al., 2020 ONSC 90

The plaintiff moved to correct a misnomer in his Statement of Claim by substituting 2090990 Ontario Inc. (Cezanne Homes) for the unnamed defendant 'XYZ Contracting Corporation'.

The plaintiff alleged that renovations at his neighbours' property caused structural damage to his own property.

The court found that the plaintiff intended to sue the contractor responsible for the renovations and that Cezanne Homes, upon reading the claim, would know it was the intended defendant.

The court allowed the substitution, finding no non-compensable prejudice to the proposed defendant.

Applicant Counsel