Limen Group Ltd. brought a motion to strike out lien claims registered by Aluma Systems Inc. and Scott Forest Products Ltd., alleging the liens were registered against the wrong premises.
Limen argued the improved lands were confined to PIN 21219-0161, while Aluma and Scott registered against adjacent PINS 21219-0159 and 21219-0160.
The court, treating the motion akin to summary judgment, found genuine issues of fact requiring a trial, including whether the adjacent PINS were part of the "improved premises" or "lands enjoyed therewith" under the Construction Lien Act.
The motion to discharge the lien claims was dismissed.