The respondent father brought an emergency motion for custody or joint custody and equal time-sharing of the parties' 21-month-old daughter.
The applicant mother had suspended the father's access based on allegations of sexual abuse related to a diaper rash.
The Children's Aid Society investigated and found no child protection concerns.
The court found the mother's allegations were unfounded and jumped to dubious conclusions.
The court ordered a temporary regime of up to 50% time-sharing for the father, based on his rotating employment schedule, to maximize the child's involvement with each parent.
