The appellant appealed an arbitrator's decision denying him post-104 week income replacement benefits following a motor vehicle accident.
The Director's Delegate allowed the appeal, finding that the arbitrator failed to provide adequate reasons for his decision and mischaracterized the test for post-104 week benefits.
The arbitrator did not properly analyze the vocational evidence or explain how the appellant was reasonably suited for the suggested alternative employments.
The decision was rescinded and the matter returned to arbitration before a different arbitrator.
