The father brought a motion to change a 2007 joint custody order, seeking primary residence of the two children.
The mother opposed and sought sole custody.
The court found that the escalating parental conflict constituted a material change in circumstances.
However, the court concluded that changing primary residence or granting sole custody would not address the core problem of parental conflict.
The court dismissed both parties' claims to change custody and primary residence, maintaining joint custody with primary residence to the mother.
The court ordered both parents to attend counseling to assist them in co-parenting and made minor modifications to the access schedule.