2 total
Section 75 of the National Energy Board Act does not create a civil cause of action for compensation.
The appellant landowners brought a class action claiming compensation from the respondent pipeline companies for restrictions on the use of their lands imposed by government regulation under the National Energy Board Act.
The motion judge dismissed the action on summary judgment.
On appeal, the Court of Appeal upheld the dismissal, finding that s. 75 of the Act does not create a civil cause of action for compensation, but rather provides a complete code for negotiation and arbitration.
The Court also held that the compensation provisions in the easement agreements were limited to physical damages and did not cover economic losses resulting from regulatory land use restrictions.
Appeal dismissed; land surrender found valid for the reasons given by the Court of Appeal.
The appellant First Nation appealed a decision upholding the validity of a land surrender.
The Supreme Court of Canada dismissed the appeal in a brief oral judgment, stating that the sole question was the validity of the surrender and expressing agreement with the reasons of the Court of Appeal.
