The applicant sought an uncontested annulment of his marriage to the respondent on the ground of non-consummation.
The parties married but the respondent refused to engage in physical intimacy due to severe anxiety, and she declined to seek medical or psychological treatment.
The court reviewed the legal test for non-consummation, which requires an incapacity or inability rather than mere refusal.
Adopting previous appellate reasoning, the court inferred that the respondent's inability to consummate arose from a psychological disability and granted the annulment.
