Ontario Review Board

The Ontario Review Board held an annual review hearing for an accused found not criminally responsible for criminal harassment.

The accused sought an absolute discharge, while the hospital and Attorney General recommended continuing the conditional discharge.

The Board found that the accused continues to pose a significant threat to public safety due to his schizophrenia, history of medication non-compliance, substance use, and limited insight.

The Board ordered the continuation of the conditional discharge with existing conditions, including residence at a supportive housing facility.

The Ontario Review Board held a hearing to review the disposition of the accused, who was found unfit to stand trial in 2009 on charges of assault and weapons offences.

The Board determined that the accused remains permanently unfit to stand trial due to an intellectual disability and schizophrenia.

Finding that the accused continues to pose a significant threat to public safety, the Board ordered the continuation of his conditional discharge, emphasizing the necessity of 24-hour supervised housing to manage his risk of violence.

The Ontario Review Board held a mandatory annual review hearing for the accused, who was previously found not criminally responsible for manslaughter and mischief.

The accused suffers from schizophrenia and continues to experience fixed grandiose delusions and a lack of insight into his illness.

The treatment team recommended a Detention Order with community living privileges, noting the accused's reluctance to use passes or engage in programming.

The Board found that the accused continues to pose a significant threat to the safety of the public and ordered a Detention Order with the conditions proposed by the hospital, concluding it was the least onerous and least restrictive disposition.

The accused, previously found not criminally responsible for assault police, appeared before the Ontario Review Board for an annual review of his conditional discharge.

The hospital and the Attorney General recommended maintaining the conditional discharge with a new travel condition, while the accused sought an absolute discharge.

The Board found that the accused continues to represent a significant threat to public safety due to his limited insight into his schizophrenia and the critical need for supervised clozapine administration to prevent psychotic relapse and violence.

The Board ordered the continuation of the conditional discharge with the hospital's recommended conditions.

The Ontario Review Board held a mandatory annual review hearing for an accused previously found not criminally responsible for attempted murder due to schizophrenia.

The hospital, Crown, and defence jointly submitted that the accused no longer posed a significant threat to public safety.

The Board accepted the uncontested evidence of the treating psychiatrist that the accused had been stable, compliant with medication, abstinent from substances, and successfully integrated into the community with employment and housing.

Finding that the accused no longer posed a significant threat to the safety of the public, the Board ordered an absolute discharge.

The Ontario Review Board held a mandatory annual review hearing for an accused found not criminally responsible for aggravated assault.

The accused, diagnosed with schizoaffective disorder, experienced a recent exacerbation of psychotic symptoms and remains treatment resistant.

The Board found that the accused continues to represent a significant threat to the safety of the public.

On joint submission, the Board ordered the continuation of her detention at the Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, with a modification to her privileges allowing the person in charge to permit travel both inside and outside of Canada.

The Ontario Review Board held an annual review hearing for the accused, who was previously found not criminally responsible for assault causing bodily harm and related offences.

The accused has been residing in the community under a conditional discharge and has made positive progress, including medication compliance and abstaining from substance use.

However, due to her history of treatment-resistant psychosis, substance use, and vulnerability to stressors, the Board found she continues to represent a significant threat to public safety.

The Board ordered the continuation of the conditional discharge with an updated residential address to support her transition to more independent living.

The Ontario Review Board conducted an annual review for an accused previously found unfit to stand trial on charges of conveying false information with intent to alarm.

The accused, who has autism spectrum disorder and an intellectual disability, resides in high-support community housing under a detention order.

The Board accepted the uncontradicted psychiatric evidence that the accused remains unfit to stand trial and continues to pose a significant threat to public safety due to poor frustration tolerance, impulsivity, and vulnerability to negative influences.

The Board ordered the continuation of the detention order with an amendment to permit international travel if accompanied by approved staff.

The Ontario Review Board held an annual hearing for the accused, who was previously found not criminally responsible for various offences including sexual assault and theft.

The hospital and Crown sought to maintain the Detention Order, citing ongoing substance use, absconding, and poor insight into his mental health condition.

The accused sought an absolute discharge.

The Board found that the accused continues to pose a significant risk to public safety and requires significant supervision in a highly supportive environment.

The Detention Order was maintained as the least onerous and least restrictive disposition.

The Ontario Review Board conducted an annual review hearing for the accused, who was previously found not criminally responsible for uttering threats and criminal harassment.

The accused, diagnosed with schizophrenia, had made significant progress in his treatment and rehabilitation at the Brockville Mental Health Centre.

Applying the Winko framework, the Board found that the accused continues to pose a significant threat to public safety.

However, balancing public safety with the accused's needs under s. 672.54 of the Criminal Code, the Board determined that a conditional discharge was the necessary and appropriate disposition.

The accused, who was previously found not criminally responsible for aggravated assault and assaulting a peace officer, appeared before the Ontario Review Board for an annual hearing.

The accused has been living in the community on a conditional discharge, maintaining abstinence from cannabis, and complying with his treatment regimen for schizophrenia.

All parties agreed that the accused continues to pose a significant threat to public safety but recommended removing the abstinence and consent to treatment clauses from his disposition to test his independence.

The Board accepted the joint submission, maintaining the conditional discharge while removing the specified clauses to support the accused's pathway toward an absolute discharge.

The Ontario Review Board held an annual review hearing for the accused, who was found not criminally responsible for aggravated assault.

The accused has a history of substance-induced psychosis and polysubstance dependence.

During the review period, the accused absconded and relapsed into substance use, demonstrating a continued significant risk to public safety.

The Board maintained the detention order, expanded the approved accommodation catchment area to include the Greater Toronto Area, and denied the accused's request to permit weekend cannabis consumption.

The Ontario Review Board held an annual review for the accused, who was previously found not criminally responsible for arson and assault.

The accused has diagnoses of schizophrenia and cannabis use disorder.

Despite periods of stability, the accused recently decompensated due to cannabis use, requiring readmission to the hospital.

Relying on uncontroverted expert psychiatric evidence, the Board found that the accused continues to pose a significant threat to public safety.

The Board ordered a continuation of the Detention Order on a General Forensic Unit.

The Ontario Review Board conducted an annual review of the accused's disposition following a finding of not criminally responsible for multiple violent offences.

The hospital and the Attorney General sought a continuation of the Detention Order, while the accused sought an Absolute Discharge.

Relying on the unanimous expert evidence of the clinical teams, the Board found that the accused remains a significant threat to public safety and requires the structure of a Detention Order to ensure treatment compliance and housing approval.

The Detention Order was continued.

The Ontario Review Board held an annual review hearing for the accused, who was found not criminally responsible for weapons offences in 2008 due to schizophrenia.

The accused had recently been transferred to the Centre for Addiction and Mental Health after a two-year wait.

The Board found that the accused continues to pose a significant threat to public safety, which was uncontested.

The Board ordered continued detention in the Secure Forensic Unit with escorted privileges, noting the accused's smooth transition and positive engagement with staff and family.

The Ontario Review Board held an annual hearing for the accused, who was found not guilty by reason of insanity for murder in 1990 and has treatment-resistant schizophrenia.

The parties presented a joint submission conceding that the accused continues to pose a significant threat to public safety.

The Board ordered the continuation of the current disposition, noting the accused's successful transition to a group home, but reduced his reporting requirements from weekly to monthly.

The Ontario Review Board held an annual hearing for the accused, who was previously found not criminally responsible for murder.

The accused's diagnoses include unspecified schizophrenia spectrum and psychotic disorder, and substance use disorder in remission.

The hospital and Crown recommended a continuation of the Detention Order with the addition of community living in approved accommodation, which the accused supported.

The Board found that the accused continues to pose a significant risk to the safety of the public but endorsed the joint submission as the least onerous and least restrictive disposition.

The Ontario Review Board conducted a mandatory review of the accused's disposition.

The accused was previously found not criminally responsible for multiple violent offences due to schizophrenia.

The Board accepted the joint submission of the parties and the evidence of the treating psychiatrist that the accused continues to pose a significant threat to public safety, particularly due to his history of absconding and substance use which precipitates psychosis.

The Board ordered the continuation of the detention disposition at the Centre for Addiction and Mental Health.

The accused, previously found not criminally responsible for pushing a victim onto subway tracks, appeared before the Ontario Review Board for her annual hearing.

The hospital and the accused sought to remove a restriction preventing her from accessing subway platforms unaccompanied, which the Crown opposed.

The Board found that while she remains a significant threat to public safety, her condition has stabilized with medication and abstinence from substances.

The Board accepted the hospital's cautious, iterative approach to reintegration and removed the subway restriction, finding it to be the least onerous and least restrictive disposition.

The Ontario Review Board held an annual review hearing for the accused, who was found not criminally responsible for assault and weapons offences in 2019.

The accused, diagnosed with schizophrenia and a substance use disorder, had recently been transferred to a new hospital and demonstrated significant progress, including medication adherence and abstinence from substances.

The Board found that the accused continues to pose a significant threat to public safety but accepted a joint submission to expand his privileges, maintaining a Detention Order with increased access to the community.