Court File and Parties

CITATION: Singh et al v. Gill et al, 2025 ONSC 1495

DIVISIONAL COURT FILE NO.: 775/24 ML

DATE: 20250314

SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE – ONTARIO

DIVISIONAL COURT

RE: DALIP HEMRAJ SINGH and PRIASHNA SINGH Plaintiffs/Defendants by Counterclaim (Moving Parties)

AND:

RUPINDER GILL and PLWINDER GILL Defendants/Plaintiffs by Counterclaim (Responding Parties)

AND:

NIRMAL BRAR, NAVJOT SINGH, and ROYAL LEPAGE FLOWER CITY REALTY Defendants (Interested Parties)

BEFORE: Leitch, Faieta, and Shore JJ.

COUNSEL: D. H. Singh and P. Singh, for the Moving Parties A. Sidhu, for the Responding Parties, Rupinder Gill, and Palwinder Gill A. Herschorn, for the Defendants, Nirmal Brar, Navjot Singh and Royal LePage Flower City Realty

HEARD: In-writing

ENDORSEMENT

[1] The motion for leave to appeal the decision of G. M. Miller, J. dated December 12, 2024 is dismissed with costs payable by the Moving Parties to the Responding Parties in the all-inclusive amount of $5000.00.

Leitch J.

Faieta J.

Shore J.

Released: March 14, 2025