CITATION: Layton v. Municipal Property Assessment Corporation Region 03, 2022 ONSC 5517
DIVISIONAL COURT FILE NO.: 345/21
DATE: 2022/09/29
SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE - ONTARIO
DIVISIONAL COURT
RE: Melynda Layton and Gregory Sean Terris, Moving Parties
AND
Municipal Property Assessment Corporation Region 03 and The City of Ottawa, Responding Parties
BEFORE: R. Ryan Bell J.
COUNSEL: Melynda Layton, self-represented, for the Moving Parties
Donald Mitchell, for MPAC
No one appearing for the City of Ottawa
HEARD: September 22, 2022
DECISION ON MOTION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL
[1] The motion for leave to appeal the decision of the Assessment Review Board dated March 30, 2021, is dismissed with costs to the respondent, Municipal Property Assessment Corporation Region 03, fixed in the amount of $3,500.
[2] Consistent with the usual practice in this court, there shall be no reasons for this decision: County of Wellington v. Municipal Property Assessment Corporation Region No. 22, 2022 ONSC 1458; Westhaver Boutique Residences Inc. v. Toronto, 2020 ONSC 3949.
R. Ryan Bell J.
Date: September 29, 2022
CITATION: Layton v. Municipal Property Assessment Corporation Region 03, 2022 ONSC 5517
DIVISIONAL COURT FILE NO.: 345/21
DATE: 2022/09/29
SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE - ONTARIO
DIVISIONAL COURT
RE: Melynda Layton and Gregory Sean Terris
Moving parties
AND
Municipal Property Assessment Corporation Region 03 and The City of Ottawa
Responding parties
BEFORE: Justice R. Ryan Bell
COUNSEL: Melynda Layton, self-represented, for the Moving Parties
Donald Mitchell, for MPAC
No one appearing for the City of Ottawa
HEARD: September 22, 2022
ENDORSEMENT
RYAN BELL J.
Released: September 29, 2022