Court File and Parties
CITATION: Uap Inc. v. Yako Hirmiz (Jacob) Yako et al., 2021 ONSC 7121
DIVISIONAL COURT FILE NO.: 638-21
DATE: 20211102
SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE – ONTARIO
DIVISIONAL COURT
RE: UAP iNC., Moving Party (Plaintiff)
AND:
YAKO HIRMIZ (JACOB) YAKO, SABAH (SAM) YAKO, SAKO AUTO PARTS INC., PRECISE AUTO PARTS LTD., SOWOD YAKO, ROBERT DININO, LAWRENCE TYLER BACCHUS and PICKERING DISCOUNT AUTO PARTS INC., o/a 747 AUTO PARTS, Responding Parties (Defendants)
BEFORE: Backhouse, Corbett and Lederer JJ.
COUNSEL: Sara J. Erskine and Ian Literovich, for the Moving Party (Plaintiff)
Bota McNamara, Christopher Lee, Wendy Ngai, Laura J. Freitag and Sharon Ilavsky, for the Responding Parties (Defendants)
HEARD: in writing
ENDORSEMENT
[1] The motion for leave to appeal the order of E. M. Morgan J. released July 19, 2021 is dismissed.
[2] Costs to the Responding Parties Robert Dinino and Lawrence Tyler Bacchus (Defendants) of $7500 and to the Responding Parties Yako Hirmiz (Jacob) Yako, Sabah (Sam) Yako, and Sako Auto Parts Inc.(Defendants) of $7500.
Backhouse J.
Corbett J.
Lederer J.
Released: November 2, 2021

