The applicant moved for an extension of time to seek leave to appeal, and for leave to appeal, from a provincial offences appeal decision upholding a careless driving conviction entered in absentia.
The proposed appeal raised a statutory interpretation issue under s. 9.1 of the Provincial Offences Act concerning whether a certificate of offence is complete and regular on its face where the handwritten offence description conflicts with the cited section number.
The court held that this issue raised a question of law alone of public importance, particularly given conflicting lower-court authority and the limited guidance provided by prior appellate authority on analogous but distinct defects.
Both the extension of time and leave to appeal were granted.