Court of Appeal for Ontario
CITATION: Jack Ganz Consulting Ltd. v. Recipe Unlimited Corporation, 2022 ONCA 127
DATE: 20220210
DOCKET: C68546
Feldman, Harvison Young and Thorburn JJ.A.
BETWEEN
Jack Ganz Consulting Ltd.
Plaintiff (Appellant)
and
Recipe Unlimited Corporation
Defendant (Respondent)
Patricia Virc and M. Michael Title, for the appellant
Ken Prehogan, Hayley Peglar and Max Skrow, for the respondent
Heard: in writing
On appeal from the judgment of Justice Sandra Nishikawa of the Superior Court of Justice, dated May 28, 2020, with reasons reported at 2020 ONSC 3319.
COSTS ENDORSEMENT
[1] On December 20, 2021, this court released its decision allowing the appeal, setting aside the summary judgment below and remitting the matter for trial. The court awarded the appellant the costs of the appeal, fixed in the agreed amount of $20,000, and invited the parties to make written submissions on the costs of the summary judgment motion. We have reviewed their written submissions and bills of costs.
[2] The appellant asks for its costs of the motion on a partial indemnity basis in the amount of $100,000. The appellant submits that, given the complexity of the action and its counsel’s unusually low rates relative to their years of call, it is appropriate to discount its actual costs by much less than the usual 40% discount to arrive at a partial indemnity amount. The amount requested by the appellant reflects a discount of approximately 7% from its actual costs of the motion.
[3] The respondent does not dispute that the appellant is entitled to its costs of the motion but submits that the costs sought by the appellant are excessive. The respondent says that a reasonable amount would be, at the very most, $66,047.26. However, the respondent argues that this amount captures costs in respect of duplicative steps taken by the appellant, and that a fair and reasonable costs award would therefore be $45,281.10.
[4] In our view, an award of costs in the amount of $80,000 inclusive of disbursements and HST is a fair and reasonable amount to fix for the costs of the summary judgment motion. We order the costs of the motion to the appellant in this amount.
“K. Feldman J.A.”
“A. Harvison Young J.A.”
“J.A. Thorburn J.A.”

