COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO

CITATION: Jiang v. Jade-Kennedy Development Corporation, 2015 ONCA 369

DATE: 20150522

DOCKET: M44935 (C58683)

Epstein, Pepall and Benotto JJ.A.

BETWEEN

Runquan Jiang

Plaintiff (Appellant)

and

Jade-Kennedy Development Corporation, Tradeworld Realty Inc., and Philip K.S. Ching

Defendants (Respondent in appeal)

Counsel:

John O’Sullivan, for the appellant

Stephen Schwartz, for the respondent Jade-Kennedy Development Corporation

Heard: April 28, 2015

ADDENDUM

[1] The appellant brought a motion asking the panel to reconsider its decision. The panel declined to address an issue that was not part of the directed issue before the trial judge.

[2] After considering the written submissions of the parties, we will not reconsider the decision rendered.

[3] Upon reviewing the Endorsement, we wish to make a change to the second sentence in paragraph 10. The words “The Act requires that” should be deleted. The sentence should read “The disclosure statement provides that the plan…”

[4] The motion is dismissed with costs to the respondent fixed at $500.00 inclusive of HST and disbursements.

“Gloria Epstein J.A.”

“S.E. Pepall J.A.”

“M.L. Benotto J.A.”