COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO
CITATION: The Canada Trust Company v. Browne, 2012 ONCA 862
DATE: 20121207
DOCKET: C53262
Feldman, Simmons and Cronk JJ.A.
In the Matter of the Primo Poloniato Grandchildren’s Trust
BETWEEN
The Canada Trust Company Trustee of the Primo Poloniato Grandchildren's Trust Applicant (Respondent)
and
Russell Browne, John Mori Jr., Andrea L. Mori-Mickus, Laura Lee, Marla L. Ashmore, Teresa O'Neil, Michael Poloniato, Kristen Wiley, Brandon Ashmore, and The Children's Lawyer on behalf of the minors, Rachel Browne, Hailey Browne, Michelle Wiley, Jessica Ashmore, Julia Mickus, Robert Mickus, Olivia Mickus, John Mickus, Marissa Lee, Erica Lee and on behalf of the unborn and unascertained beneficiaries of the Primo Poloniato Grandchildren's Trust Respondents (Appellant/Respondents)
Earl A. Cherniak, Q.C. and Cynthia B. Kuehl, for the appellant
Archie J. Rabinowitz, David Lobl, and Jeremy C. Millard, for the respondent Canada Trust Company
Mark Abradjian, Christopher R. Durdan and Brad Wiseman, for the respondents John Mori Jr., Marla L. Ashmore and Teresa O’Neil
Heard: April 11, 2012
On appeal from the order of Justice Laurence A. Pattillo of the Superior Court of Justice, dated October 5, 2011, with reasons reported at 2011 ONSC 731.
Feldman J.A.:
INTRODUCTION
[1] The Children’s Lawyer brings this appeal on behalf of the minor, unborn and unascertained beneficiaries of the Primo Poloniato Grandchildren’s Trust (the “Trust”). The Trust was settled in October 1980 by Primo Poloniato, the founder of Primo Foods Ltd., in favour of his grandchildren (the income beneficiaries) and their issue, his great-grandchildren (the capital beneficiaries). The Trust’s principal asset is shares in 679312 Alberta Ltd. (the “Holding Company”), a private investment company controlled by the Trust. While the value of the Trust has fluctuated over the years, at its peak it was worth in excess of $130 million.
[2] Since its inception, the Trust has been varied with court approval twice - in December 1988 and again by a deed of arrangement, dated December 1997, which was approved in March 1998. Both variations were made based on the agreement and consent of all parties, including the Children’s Lawyer (in 1988, the Official Guardian) on behalf of minor, unborn and unascertained beneficiaries.
[3] The application that gives rise to this appeal was brought by Canada

