Court of Appeal for Ontario
Citation: Mohamed v. Salad, 2012 ONCA 439
Date: 2012-06-21
Docket: C53877
Before: Gillese, Rouleau and Epstein JJ.A.
Between:
Abdulkadir Mohamed
Appellant
and
Maria Salad
Respondent
Counsel:
Joseph Osuji, for the appellant
Ahmad Baksh, for the respondent
Heard: June 18, 2012
On appeal from the judgment of Justice Douglas Gray of the Superior Court of Justice, dated June 7, 2011.
APPEAL BOOK ENDORSEMENT
[1] The appellant raises two issues on appeal:
- spousal support; and
- entitlement to an in interest in the home registered in the respondent’s name.
[2] The trial judge found that the parties separated no later than March of 2000. This finding was based on the appellant’s own affidavit. The trial judge went on to find that the parties never lived in the property in question as husband and wife. While the appellant was in the property periodically in order to babysit the children, the property was not a matrimonial home within the meaning of the family law legislation.
[3] Furthermore, the trial judge rejected the appellant’s evidence that the contributed $54,000 in cash towards the cost of the property. The trial judge was entitled to make that finding on the evidence before him.
[4] As for spousal support, the trial judge found that the appellant had not furnished evidence sufficient to establish an entitlement to spousal support. The appellant has pointed to no such evidence on this appeal.
[5] Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed with costs to the respondent fixed at $2000, inclusive of disbursements and all applicable taxes.