CITATION: Ursic v. Ursic, 2007 ONCA 85

DATE: 20070212

DOCKET: C42170

COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO

RE:

ERIC MICHAEL URSIC (Respondent) – and - JOANNE HILDA URSIC (Appellant)

BEFORE:

LASKIN, BORINS and JURIANSZ JJ.A.

COUNSEL:

Malcolm Bennett

for the appellant

Norman M. Aitken

for the respondent

HEARD:

February 6, 2007 in-writing

On appeal from the judgment of Justice James M. Donnelly of the Superior Court of Justice, dated June 11 2004, made at Woodstock, Ontario.

C O S T S E N D O R S E M E N T

[1] Following release of our reasons in which we fixed costs, we were reminded that we had indicated at the hearing that we would not dispose of costs without giving counsel the opportunity to make written submissions. We have received extensive submissions. Having reviewed those submissions we are not persuaded we should vary the costs disposition in our decision.

[2] As indicated in the court’s reasons, the respondent’s obligation is to pay net child support in accordance with the Child Support Guidelines.

“John Laskin J.A.”

“S. Borins J.A.”

“R. Juriansz J.A.”