September 9, 2004

Stelco Inc. (Re), 2004 ONCA 66332

Case Summary

The moving party, CAFO Inc., sought leave to appeal in the Stelco Inc. proceedings. The Court of Appeal for Ontario granted leave to appeal with respect to the questions in paragraphs 23-28 of the moving party's factum, but denied leave for question 29. Costs of the motion were reserved to the panel hearing the appeal.

Ontario Court of Appeal for Ontario

Stelco Inc. (Re)

Date: 2004-09-09

Docket: CA M31229

Robin B. Cumine, Q.C., G.F. Camelino for CAFO Inc.

Per curiam:

[1] Leave to appeal is granted with respect to the questions in paras. 23-28, but not question 29 of CAFO’s Factum. Costs of this motion reserved to the panel hearing the appeal.

Motion granted.

Judge

PPer curiam

Counsel

Applicant
Q

Q.C.

Applicant

GG.F. Camelino

Applicant

RRobin B. Cumine

Parties

Stelco Inc.respondent
CAFO Inc.applicant

Areas of Law

Bankruptcy and Insolvency Law Corporate/Commercial Law

Fact Patterns

leave to appealinsolvency proceedings

Issues

Whether leave to appeal should be granted regarding the questions raised in the moving party's factum→ granted in part — leave granted for questions 23-28, but denied for question 29