Court of Appeal for Ontario
Date: 2018-02-07 Docket: C62776 Judges: MacFarland, Benotto and Brown JJ.A.
Between
Her Majesty the Queen Respondent
and
Pierre Maurice Aragon Appellant
Counsel
Ariel Herscovitch, for the appellant
Andreea Baiasu, for the respondent
Heard and Released
Heard and released orally: February 1, 2018
On appeal from the conviction entered on April 18, 2016 and the sentence imposed on April 18, 2016 by Justice Lisa Cameron of the Ontario Court of Justice.
Reasons for Decision
[1]
Reasons for Decision
We are satisfied that the appellant's attendance was properly compelled by the judge's order and agree with the Crown's submission that the service of a subpoena in addition would have been superfluous and unnecessary. The appellant was by that order required to testify and he refused to do so. He was afforded ample opportunity on this record to consult counsel and to consider his position. He declined the trial judge's offer of further time to consult with counsel. He made it perfectly clear that he would not testify. He knew the difference between perjury and contempt and he chose contempt. The judge's finding of contempt on this record is unassailable. The case was a simple one and her reasons, although brief, are sufficient to explain to the appellant why he was convicted. It was not complicated. Contempt of court is always a serious matter and strikes at the very heart of the administration of justice.
[2]
Disposition
The sentence appeal is abandoned and accordingly the appeal is dismissed.
"J. MacFarland J.A."
"M.L. Benotto J.A."
"David Brown J.A."
