Court Information
CITATION: Haig v. Morgan, 2014 ONSC 988
DIVISIONAL COURT FILE NO.: 333/13
DATE: 20140212
ONTARIO
SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE
DIVISIONAL COURT
A.C.J.S.C. MARROCCO, KITELEY AND WHITAKER JJ.
Parties and Counsel
BETWEEN:
GRAHAM HAIG
Appellant
– and –
BESSY MORGAN
Respondent
Counsel:
Graham Haig, In Person
David S. Strashin, for the Respondent
HEARD at Toronto: February 12, 2014
Oral Reasons for Judgment
A.C.J.S.C. MARROCCO (ORALLY)
[1] As between this landlord and this tenant, the essential issue as to whether there is estoppel based on the 2012 final order concerning the description of the premises is, in our view, a hypothetical issue.
[2] Relying on Borowski v. Canada (Attorney General), [1989] 1 S.C.R. 342, we decline to exercise our discretion to permit the appeal to proceed.
[3] The appeal is dismissed as moot.
[4] Under the circumstances as described in the materials by both sides, there will be no order concerning costs.
A.C.J.S.C. MARROCCO
KITELEY J.
WHITAKER J.
Date of Reasons for Judgment: February 12, 2014
Date of Release: February 21, 2014
CITATION: Haig v. Morgan, 2014 ONSC 988
DIVISIONAL COURT FILE NO.: 333/13
DATE: 20140212
ONTARIO
SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE
DIVISIONAL COURT
A.C.J.S.C. MARROCCO, KITELEY AND WHITAKER JJ.
BETWEEN:
GRAHAM HAIG
Appellant
– and –
BESSY MORGAN
Respondent
ORAL REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
A.C.J.S.C. MARROCCO
Date of Reasons for Judgment: February 12, 2014
Date of Release: February 21, 2014