Court of Appeal for Ontario
Date: 20211130 Docket: C69028
Benotto, Huscroft and Miller JJ.A.
Between
Grand River Conservation Authority Applicant (Respondent in Appeal)
and
Jason Geil & Geil Style Enterprises Inc. Respondents (Appellants)
Counsel: Sean Biesbroek, for the appellants Steven J. O’Melia, for the respondent
Heard and released orally: November 29, 2021
On appeal from the order of Justice J.W. Sloan of the Superior Court of Appeal, dated December 16, 2020.
Reasons for Decision
1The appellant was found in contempt of a consent order that he and his agents refrain from dumping fill on wetlands controlled by the Grand River Conservation Authority.
2He appeals the motion’s judge’s finding arguing that the motion judge erred by,
(i) relying on hearsay in the supporting affidavits;
(ii) making a finding of contempt without evidence as to when the fill arrived on the property; and
(iii) relying on an affidavit that was filed after the time required by the Rules.
3We see no merit to these submissions.
4The appellant filed no material on the motion. The motion judge relied on firsthand evidence that the fill was placed on the property. The affidavit evidence established that the fill was deposited after the date of the court order. The precise date does not matter. The judge did not err by relying on the affidavit filed late because accepting it was within his discretion. The motion judge applied the correct test on a contempt motion, and it was open to him to conclude that the appellant was in contempt of the order. This finding is entitled to deference.
5The appeal is dismissed with costs to the respondent in the amount of $20,000 plus HST.
“M.L. Benotto J.A.”
“Grant Huscroft J.A.”
“B.W. Miller J.A.”