Court of Appeal for Ontario
Simmons, Lauwers and Nordheimer JJ.A.
BETWEEN
Her Majesty the Queen
Respondent
and
Cun Chau Vong
Appellant
Counsel:
Nadia Guo, for the appellant/responding party
Nicolas de Montigny, for the respondent/moving party
Heard and released orally: November 18, 2020 by video conference
On appeal from the conviction entered on November 21, 2019 by Justice Peter C. West of the Ontario Court of Justice.
REASONS FOR DECISION
1The Crown moves to quash this appeal on the ground that the charge in issue is a summary conviction offence and, consequently, any appeal from conviction lies to the Superior Court of Justice and not to this court.
2We agree. The trial judge expressly referred to the section to which the appellant was pleading guilty, namely, s. 286.1(1)(b)(i)(A). He also amended the Information to record that specific offence. Section 286.1(1)(b) specifically creates offences that are punishable on summary conviction, with different fines applicable depending on the nature of the offence. While there may be other issues surrounding the plea in this case, they are all matters that are properly addressed at the appeal. Those issues do not change the fact that this was a conviction arising out of a summary conviction offence and, thus, an appeal does not lie to this court.
3The appeal is quashed.
“Janet Simmons J.A.” “P. Lauwers J.A.” “I.B.V. Nordheimer J.A.”
