R. v. Sidhu, 2018 ONCA 591

Court of Appeal for Ontario

Date: 2018-06-27 Docket: C65446

Judges: Watt, Pardu and Roberts JJ.A.

Between

Her Majesty the Queen Appellant

and

Jaspal Sidhu Respondent

Counsel

Jeff Marshman, for the appellant

Kathleen Farrell, for the respondent

Heard and Released

Heard and released orally: June 25, 2018

On appeal from the sentence imposed on April 10, 2018 by Justice Allan Maclure of the Ontario Court of Justice.

Reasons for Decision

[1]

Background

On April 10, 2018 the appellant pled guilty to several offences including theft, possession of stolen property, flight from police and two counts of failing to comply with the terms of a recognizance. In accordance with a joint submission, the presiding judge sentenced the appellant to a term of imprisonment of 6 months, the sentence to be served consecutively to a 12 month sentence the parties believed the appellant to then be serving. The intention of the parties was that the global sentence be one of 18 months in custody.

2As it turned out, the appellant had finished serving his earlier sentence about one month prior to the imposition of the sentence under appeal. His detention, at that time, was due to the charges to which this sentence from appeal relates.

3Since the parties were under the erroneous impression that the appellant was still serving his previous sentence when the sentence under appeal was imposed, no credit was sought and none given for a period of 32 days between expiration of the prior sentence and imposition of the sentence under appeal.

[4]

Analysis

It is common ground between the parties that the appellant should have received a credit of 48 days for the 32 days spent in pre-disposition custody on the charges to which this appeal relates. We agree.

[5]

Disposition

In the result, leave to appeal sentence is granted, the appeal allowed and the sentence reduced from 184 days to 136 days. The ancillary orders imposed by the sentencing judge will remain in place.