Court of Appeal for Ontario
Before: Goudge, Rouleau and Watt JJ.A.
Between:
Her Majesty the Queen
Respondent
and
Christopher Kaszas
Appellant
Counsel:
S. Shikhman and S. Menzies, for the appellant
Mabel Lai, for the respondent
Heard: October 26, 2012
On appeal from the conviction entered on July 8, 2011 by Justice D. Kent Kirkland of the Ontario Court of Justice, sitting without a jury.
APPEAL BOOK ENDORSEMENT
1In our view it is clear, as the Crown acknowledges that the trial judge accepted the appellant’s evidence about what happened during the ten second episode. The trial judge treated the episode as continuous and as he should, assessed the manner of driving displayed. The reasons, while not perfect are nonetheless sufficient for this court to review the trial judge’s reasoning process, namely that having set out with the deliberate showing off by squealing his tires, the appellant left himself too little time to correct his accidental hitting the accelerator not the brake.
2This finding was open to him on this record. The trial judge neither failed to consider evidence called by the appellant nor offered reasons insufficient for appellate review.
3The appeal must be dismissed.