COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO
RE:
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN (Respondent) – and – BRYAN THOMPSON (Appellant)
BEFORE:
LABROSSE, MOLDAVER and CRONK JJ.A.
COUNSEL:
André Bluteau
for the appellant
Sunita Srivastava
for the respondent
HEARD & ENDORSED:
In-writing on January 19, 2007
On appeal from the conviction entered on May 10, 2006 by Justice Robert L. Maranger of the Superior Court of Justice.
A P P E A L B O O K E N D O R S E M E N T
1In the pre-trial motion under appeal, the appellant again argues that because the offences are alleged to have occurred in the 1970’s, the law as it was then ought to apply, including the requirements for corroboration.
2As in his prior appeal (C42471), the appellant seeks a ruling from this court regarding a decision in a pre-trial motion.
3As in the prior appeal, the order is an interlocutory order made in an indictable proceeding and is not appealable until the conclusion of the trial.
4The appeal is quashed. “J.M. Labrosse J.A.”
“M. Moldaver J.A.”
“E.A. Cronk J.A.”