COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO
RE:
METROPOLITAN TORONTO CONDOMINIUM CORPORATION No. 562 (Applicant/Respondent) – and – ARTHUR FROOM (Respondent/Appellant)
BEFORE:
BORINS, JURIANSZ and LAFORME JJ.A.
COUNSEL:
Arthur Froom
In person
Christopher J. Jaglowitz
For the applicant/respondent
HEARD & RELEASED ORALLY:
August 15, 2006
On appeal from the order of Justice Arthur Belobaba of the Superior Court of Justice dated October 14, 2005.
E N D O R S E M E N T
1We are satisfied that the dispute between the parties relates to the application of the respondent condominium’s pet rules. Central to the resolution of Mr. Froom’s alleged failure to comply with the pet rules was whether the 2003 release applies to the new rules and the present circumstances. In our view, the interpretation of the 2003 release and the compliance issue could not be separated, and together should have been submitted to the mediation and arbitration of the Condominium Act before the respondent resorted to the court.
2Accordingly, the appeal is allowed and the order of Belobaba J. is set aside. The application is dismissed with costs of both the application and the appeal in the amount of $8,500 inclusive of disbursements and GST.
“S. Borins J.A.”
“R. Juriansz J.A.”
“H.S. LaForme J.A.”
