COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO

RE:

ROYAL BANK OF CANADA (Plaintiff/Respondent) – and – CENTRAL CANADIAN INDUSTRIAL INC., VLADEN MATUTSCHOVSKY a. k. a. VLADEN MATUTSCHOYSKY a. k. a. VLADEN MATUTSCHOUSKY a. k. a. VLADEN MATUSOVSKI and KATHERINE MATUTSCHOVSKY a. k. a. EKATRINA MATUTSCHOYSKY a. k. a. EKATERINA WEIS MATUTSCHOVSKY a. k. a. KATHRYN MATUSHOVSKY a. k. a. KATHERINE MATUTSCHOUSKY (Defendant/ Appellant)

BEFORE:

WEILER, LASKIN and ROSENBERG JJ.A.

COUNSEL:

Katherine Matutschovsky

appellant, in-person

Gregory W. Bowden

for the respondent

HEARD & ENDORSED:

January 9, 2006

On appeal from the order of Justice Kenneth A. Langdon of the Superior Court of Justice dated June 30, 2005.

A P P E A L B O O K E N D O R S E M E N T

[1] We agree with the decision of Langdon J. In substance, the counterclaim is an action for damages for being sued. The counterclaim does not disclose a cause of action.

[2] Appeal is dismissed with costs fixed at $500.00 inclusive of disbursements and GST.

Royal Bank of Canada v. Central Canadian Industrial Inc., 2006 ONCA 715

Case Summary

COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO

On appeal from the order of Justice Kenneth A. Langdon of the Superior Court of Justice dated June 30, 2005.

A P P E A L B O O K E N D O R S E M E N T

Judges

Counsel

Parties

Areas of Law

Fact Patterns

Financial Outcomes

Issues