COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO
RE:
ANTONINO PIPITONE (Applicant/Respondent) – and – ANTONIETTA PIPITONE (Respondent/Appellant)
BEFORE:
DOHERTY, MACPHERSON and CRONK JJ.A.
COUNSEL:
Antonietta Pipitone
in-person
Joseph Kary
for the respondent
HEARD & ENDORSED:
July 5, 2005
On appeal from the order of Justice Joseph M. W. Donohue of the Superior Court of Justice dated October 29, 2004.
A P P E A L B O O K E N D O R S E M E N T
1The application judge, Donohue J., properly considered the various factors in s. 15 of the Divorce Act, including the relatively short duration of the marriage, the appellant’s assets upon dissolution, the respondent’s lack of assets, and the absence of children in the marriage. We can see no error in his analysis or in his conclusion that spousal support should cease. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.
2No costs of the appeal or the motion before Sharpe J.A.