DOCKET:C37894
COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO
CARTHY, LASKIN AND CRONK JJ.A.
IN THE MATTER OF THE BANKRUPTCY OF HYDRA-DYNE INDUSTRIAL CLEANING SERVICES LTD., of the City of Sarnia, in the Province of Ontario
B E T W E E N:
HYDRA-DYNE INDUSTRIAL CLEANING SERVICES LTD.
Raymond F. Leach for the appellant
Appellant/Moving Party
- and -
KPMG INC., TRUSTEE IN BANKRUPTCY
Timothy C. Hogan for the respondent
Respondent
Heard: December 10, 2002
On appeal from the order of Justice I.M. Gordon of the Superior Court of Justice dated February 19, 2002.
1The bankrupt company appeals from the dismissal by Gordon J. of its motion to annul the bankruptcy.
2Section 181(1) of the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. B-3 reads:
- (1) Where, in the opinion of the court, a receiving order ought not to have been made or an assignment ought not to have been filed, the court may by order annul the bankruptcy.
3Hydra-Dyne was a substantial private company with over one hundred employees and gross revenue of over $11 million dollars. Its president and principal shareholder was Walter Dynes. In May of 2001, the National Bank of Canada called upon the company for immediate repayment of over $1.8 million then owing to the bank. The bank then entered into a forbearance agreement to give the company an opportunity to obtain a replacement financing facility and had in the meantime installed KPMG as a business monitor. In September the bank gave notice of defaults in the forbearance agreement, including a failure to remit source deductions and G.S.T. to the federal government and margin defaults to the bank. When these defaults were not cured, the bank terminated its forbearance agreement and took steps to close down the business. KPMG prepared and presented to Walter Dynes the documentation for an assignment for the general benefit of creditors, including a statement showing the assets and debts of the company. These were signed by Dynes on November 6, 2001.
4Section 49 of the Act reads in part:
- (1) An insolvent person or, if deceased, his legal personal representative with the leave of the court, may make an assignment of all his property for the general benefit of his creditors.
(2) The assignment made under subsection (1) shall be accompanied by a sworn statement in the prescribed form showing the property of the debtor divisible among his creditors, the names and addresses of all his creditors and the amounts of their respective claims and the nature of each, whether secured, preferred or unsecured.
5Dynes signed this document in the presence of the KPMG representative, Stephen Cherniak, who then returned to his office to have a commissioner for taking affidavits complete the jurat. The “affidavit” was then presented to the Official Receiver and a trustee appointed.
6A motion followed to annul the bankruptcy alleging that the statement of affairs was not properly sworn and did not accurately express the financial position of the company, that it was not bankrupt, that Dynes had no authority to sign on behalf of the company, that Dynes acted under duress, and that the procedure followed was an abuse of process. These arguments were all pursued before this court.
7Justice Gordon recited the facts in far more detail than I have found necessary and concluded at paragraph 61 of his reasons:
61In summary, Hydra-Dyne was insolvent and there is no abuse of process. Mr. Dynes has not satisfied the court there was lack of appreciation of the nature and effect of the documents he signed nor was there duress beyond the normal stress of financial insolvency. That Mr. Dynes held himself out as able to bind the company is clear and in addition the director or directors by their signatures knew that he signed for the company on major banking documents. They cannot now come to the court and deny his authority.
8These conclusions are fully supported by the evidence and the only ground which gives this court reason to hesitate is that based on the failure to swear the affidavit before a Commissioner.
9It is a thin excuse for the KPMG representative to say that he was unaware of the necessity for the commissioner to be present to swear the affidavit. That requirement is plain on the face of the document. Further, the affidavit is a document which initiates a judicial process and is relied upon as the foundation of that process. A casual approach to the integrity of the document reflects upon the process and should not be tolerated.
10Having said that, the focus of the jurisprudence dealing with annulment has been on the conduct of the debtor and the solvency of the debtor, giving the motion judge a wide discretion to deal with the particular circumstances of the instant case. See: Re: Bateman (1998), 1998 12457 (NS SC), 10 C.B.R. (4th) 197 at 199-200 (N.S.S.C.); Re: Wale, [1996] O.J. No. 4489 at 4 (Gen. Div.); and Columbia Properties Ltd. v. Commonwealth Mtge Corpn. (1964), 1964 433 (BC CA), 6 C.B.R. (N.S.) 321 at 325 (B.C.C.A.).
11In this case, Justice Gordon found that the statement of affairs contained no substantial errors and that the debtor was clearly insolvent. It would defeat that purpose of the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act directed at protection of creditors to now annul the bankruptcy and, thus, I would in this case agree with the motion judge that no substantial injustice has been caused by the impropriety in execution of the affidavit, or to put the converse, there would be an injustice to the creditors to order annulment.
12I would therefore dismiss the appeal and also dismiss the cross-appeal that seeks alternatively a declaration as to Dyne’s authority to sign for the company. No time in argument was devoted to the cross-appeal and it should be dismissed without costs. The respondent should recover the costs of the appeal fixed on a partial indemnity basis at $12,000 plus disbursements of $446.15 plus G.S.T., offset by $4,000 plus G.S.T. payable to the appellant for the motion for security for costs.
Released: January 29, 2003 “JJC”
“J.J. Carthy J.A.”
“I agree J.I. Laskin J.A.”
“I agree E.A. Cronk J.A.”