DATE: 2003-09-05
DOCKET: C39536
COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO
RE:
LORETTA CORCHIS (Plaintiff) – and – ESSEX CONDOMINIUM CORPORATION NO. 28 (Defendant (Appellant in Appeal)) – and – LONDON CAULKING AND INSTALLATIONS LIMITED and CONSTANTINE BACH (Third Parties (Respondents in Appeal))
BEFORE:
LABROSSE, ABELLA and CRONK JJ.A.
COUNSEL:
Mason Greenaway, for the defendant (appellant in appeal)
Arthur Barat, for the third parties (respondents in appeal)
HEARD & ENDORSED:
September 4, 2003
On appeal from the order of Justice S. Rogin of the Superior Court of Justice dated January 15, 2003.
APPEAL BOOK ENDORSEMENT
1In our view, the decision of this court in Ukrainian Credit Union Ltd. v. Nesbitt, Burns Ltd. (1997), 36 O.R. (3d) 311 (C.A.) is determinative of the issue raised on this appeal. The third party claim advanced against the respondents by the appellant is a claim for contribution and indemnity in connection with any sums which the appellant may be required to pay to the plaintiff in the main action.
2Contrary to the conclusion of the motions judge, such a claim for contribution and indemnity is not a claim for the recovery of damages within the meaning of s. 14(1) of the Condominium Act (Ontario). Accordingly, that section does not apply to the third party proceedings in this case.
3The appeal is therefore allowed to the extent that paragraph two (2) of the Order of the motions judge dated January 15, 2003 is set aside.
4The appellant is entitled to its costs of this appeal on a partial indemnity basis, fixed in the amount of $4,000 inclusive of disbursements and Goods and Services Tax.