COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO
RE:
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN (Respondent) v. SHOLA GRAY (Appellant)
BEFORE:
McMURTRY C.J.O., ROSENBERG AND MacPHERSON JJ.A.
COUNSEL:
Shola Gray
In Person
Gregory J. Tweney
For the respondent
HEARD:
December 21, 2001
On appeal from the conviction made by Dyson J. dated November 15, 1999.
E N D O R S E M E N T
1This appeal was heard on December 21, 2001 and our decision was reserved in order to give the appellant and the respondent until January 23, 2002 to file affidavits regarding the issue of crown disclosure.
2An affidavit was filed on behalf of the respondent but no affidavit from the appellant was received. The affidavit filed on behalf of the respondent indicates that the appellant did have the relevant disclosure of the wiretap authorizations, supporting affidavits and related appendices.
3In our view, the only issue in this appeal that might have merit is the issue as to whether the appellant had proper disclosure.
4In the result, having decided that disclosure was made, the appeal is dismissed.
“R. Roy McMurtry C.J.O.”
“M. Rosenberg J.A.
“J. C. MacPherson J.A.”