Court of Appeal for Ontario
McKillen v. Svedala Industries Canada Inc.
Counsel:
Connie Reeve, for Defendant/Appellant
R.B. Cumine, Q.C., for Plaintiff/Respondent
Judgment
1We agree with the careful reasons of Wilkins J. in his interpretation of the contract. With respect to the appellant's potential vulnerability flowing from the absence of a cost cap relating to a retirement under clause 8(b), it must be observed that such a retirement is entirely with the control of the appellant. The appeal is dismissed with costs.
Appeal dismissed.

