June 13, 2000

Canada Life Assurance Co. v. Donohue, 2000 ONCA 27011

Case Summary

The appellant challenged the trial judge's conclusion that a payment did not fall within the language of an integration provision. The Court of Appeal was not persuaded that the trial judge erred. The appeal was dismissed with costs to the respondent.

Canada Life Assurance Co. v. Donohue

Date: 2000-06-13

Denis J. Power, Q.C., for the respondent/plaintiff;

Kevin P. Nearing, for the appellant/defendant.

(C32998)

1By the Court: We're not persuaded that the trial judge erred in reaching the conclusion that the payment in question did not fall within the language of the integration provision.

2The appeal is dismissed with costs.

Appeal dismissed.