March 21, 2000

Cates v. Salamon, 2000 CanLII 26975 (ON CA)

Case Summary

The appellant challenged the trial judgment. The Court of Appeal held that it was not persuaded the judgment under appeal was erroneous and agreed with the trial judge's full and careful reasons. The appeal was dismissed with costs.

Cates v. Salamon

Date: 2000-03-21

Robert Sutherland (Watkins Law Firm), for the appellant;

Counsel for the defendants not disclosed.

(Court File No. C30394)

1By the Court: Despite the submissions of the appellant, we are not persuaded that the judgment in appeal is in error. The trial judge gave full and careful reasons for arriving at his conclusions and we agree with them.

2The appeal is dismissed with costs.

Appeal dismissed.