David (David, Demson & Hynes) v. Buttoo, 2000 CanLII 26968 (ON CA)

Case Summary

The appellant challenged the reasons of the motion judge. The Court of Appeal was not persuaded that any error had been shown on the facts of the case. The appeal was therefore dismissed with costs.

Court of Appeal for Ontario

David (David, Demson & Hynes) v. Buttoo

Date: 2000-03-16

James C. Morton and Shelley Brian Brown (Steinberg Morton Frymer), for the appellant;

A. Ian Kostman (Kostman Silver Lerner), for the respondent.

(Court File No. C32727)

1By the Court: We are not persuaded there is any error in the reasons of Nordheime, J., on the facts of this case. The appeal is dismissed with costs.

Appeal dismissed.

Legal Resources Directory

/26968

/OCA/2000/26968

David (David, Demson & Hynes) v. Buttoo, 2000 CanLII 26968 (ON CA)

March 16, 2000

CanLII

David (David, Demson & Hynes) v. Buttoo, 2000 CanLII 26968 (ON CA)

Case Summary

The appellant challenged the reasons of the motion judge. The Court of Appeal was not persuaded that any error had been shown on the facts of the case. The appeal was therefore dismissed with costs.

Court of Appeal for Ontario