The respondent requested that the human rights application be deferred pending the completion of a concurrent grievance arbitration process.
The applicant opposed the deferral, arguing that she did not want the union to raise human rights issues in her grievances.
The Tribunal found that the grievances raised similar facts and human rights issues, and that the union had carriage of the grievances.
The Tribunal granted the request and deferred the application pending the conclusion of the grievance arbitration process.
