The appellants challenged an order refusing relief from a default judgment and raised issues concerning notice of a sale and prior proceedings, as well as the interpretation of the Conveyancing and Law of Property Act.
The court held that the motion judge reasonably found one appellant had not moved promptly enough to set aside the default judgment.
It also upheld the factual finding that the other appellant had notice of both the sale and earlier proceedings.
The statutory interpretation argument was rejected, and the appeal was dismissed with costs.
